Dream the Impeachable Dream
Quit while you're behind
Did you know that there’s been a whisper around
Washington that George W. Bush should be impeached? And that whisper
is starting to get louder?
Neither did I.
I read a commentary piece from The Nation where this notion
was advanced. I know what you’re saying: “A liberal
publication coming out in favor of Bush’s impeachment? There’s
a shocker!” (Well, either that or, “You can read?”)
But the writer kept trying to hype the idea, saying the recent
wiretapping controversy was illegal and, thus, we should be gathering
the torches and pitchforks to storm the White House and bring
Bush to justice.
After I read the piece, I had to laugh for two reasons. First,
because someone told me a really funny joke when I was done. And
second, because I kept imaging the scene from “Old School”
where Will Farrell goes streaking and no one is following him,
even though he thinks everyone’s streaking along with him.
Regardless of your opinions on whether Bush is the anti-Christ
or the second coming of Christ, the fact is most people don’t
think Bush should be impeached for it.
Or do they? Two recent polls show a majority of Americans, 52%
to be precise, believe Bush should be impeached over “Snoopgate”
if there is proof that the wiretapping was illegal, and Democrats
are saying this constitutes a mandate to remove Bush. Wait. George
W. Bush wins 51% of the popular vote in 2004 and he doesn’t
have a mandate according to these folks, but get 1% more on something
they’re hoping to happen and they do?
So, who is right, the polls or your intrepid columnist? Conduct
your own experiment. Go to where people congregate, like a coffee
shop or a restaurant, and just listen to the casual chatter going
on. I think you’ll find that most people aren’t thinking
about impeachment or about anything else really except for what
they want at that particular point in time. The collective attention
span of most Americans today is shorter than an angry midget.
(Okay, I apologize for that crack. It was insensitive and wrong
of me to say “angry midget.” I will use the more politically
correct term “happiness-challenged midget.”)
The funny thing about the lack of public support of impeachment
is that the Democrats set themselves up for this. Back during
the Clinton impeachment, Democrats told us that impeachment was
a serious step, one that should not be taken lightly. We shouldn’t
let the political opponents drum up bogus charges designed to
besmirch the President and do what the opponents couldn’t
do at the ballot box. And we believed it and didn’t support
the Clinton impeachment, regardless of the legitimacy of the charges.
Now, that the roles are reversed and it’s the Democrats
are trying to impeach a Republican President, the Democrats are
acting exactly like the Republicans did with Clinton. This hits
to what I believe is the heart of the big ball of apathy in this
country today. The public sees the double standard the Democrats
are employing and they’re tuning out. How many other scandals
have Democrats said would bring down Bush? I’ve given up
trying to count them because there are so many and because my
neighbors wouldn’t let me use their fingers and toes to
help me count. Something about having to go to work or me being
a freak, I think.
Now, think back to the Republicans under Bill Clinton and how
many scandals they tried to gin up to rise to the level of impeachment.
Hel-LOOOOOOO! I know that those who don’t learn history
are doomed to repeat it (usually during summer school), but to
forget something that happened seven years ago? That’s
ridiculous even by the standards of a culture that has Howie Mandel
hosting a game show on prime time TV.
And here's the big thing. It's not going to change anything if
Bush gets impeached. With Republicans controlling the House, Senate,
and the White House, the line of succession is such that a Democrat
would be in running for the Oval Office by the time Bush is moving
out of the White House in January 2009. And that's only if they
promise to help move in the next Republican President once Bush
leaves.
I know Democrats are banking on a midterm election victory this
year that would change the Congressional landscape, but there
really isn't anything that makes people think Republicans deserve
to be booted. Tom DeLay? DeLoser of an issue for Democrats. Abramoff?
You'd need truck stop speed to keep people awake enough to pay
attention. Lying about WMDs? If lying before Congress was an impeachable
offense, you'd have trouble getting enough people to hold hearings
because most of Congress would be impeached! And contrary
to what DemocraticUnderground says, saying "Bush sucks"
repeatedly is not a winning strategy.
So, to the Democrats out there thinking that a Bush impeachment
is on the horizon, back away slowly from The Nation and
don't make any sudden moves towards your telephone to call your
Senators and Representatives. Impeaching Bush won't solve anything
and will only serve to damage the party even worse than giving
Howard Dean an open mic and unlimited access to Ted Kennedy's
wetbar. Well, unless you decide to run Gore/Kerry '08.
And that's the Bottom Line. |