Beware of Comprehensive Solutions
The preferred choice of wimps
everywhere
The relentless noise and fury surrounding the immigration
debate is typical of overblown mammoth legislative projects. All
red-blooded conservatives should automatically have their antennae
up as soon as they hear the term “comprehensive solution.”
First of all, good limited government conservatives ought to be
profoundly uncomfortable with the idea that it is the government’s
job to “solve” problems at all. One of modern conservatism’s
foundational statements is that there are no solutions,
only trade-offs.
Franklin Roosevelt played a major role in embedding this idea
of a problem-solving government into the American consciousness
with his “Four Freedoms” speech. In that speech he
redefined the core view of rights, from the positive rights of
the U.S. Constitution (“Freedom to…”)
to a new concept of negative rights (Freedom from…
Want, Fear, etc.). In this model it was not only permissible for
the government to solve problems deemed too large for people to
solve themselves, it became an obligation! To one extent or another,
every President since FDR has bought into this notion. We hear
it echoed in President Clinton’s “I feel your pain,”
and it is one of the basic underpinning of President Bush’s
Compassionate Conservatism. For all of its admirable qualities
(and there are many) the Bush Administration’s willingness
to use government coercion to “solve” all sorts of
problems is not only irksome to conservatives, but is an Achilles
heel when dealing with liberals.
So here we are with a government seeking to solve the immigration
issue with a comprehensive solution. But if we can get past the
liberal language and give the Administration the benefit of the
doubt, we should at the very least then ask “exactly what
is the problem you are trying to solve?” Knowing that the
response is likely to be a mish mash of political blather, we
might seek to force some clarity by taking it a level deeper.
We might ask “How do we know there actually is
a problem?” One way to flush out the actual problems you
are dealing with is to inquire: What if we were to “do”
nothing? What bad things would happen? What exactly is the nature
of the crisis that demands comprehensive action? Let’s take
a look by area.
Economics. The economic impact of illegal immigrants
is multifaceted, but how much of it is a problem? It is undeniable
that illegal immigrants drive wages down. But in a country with
4% unemployment it doesn’t sound right to say that they
are taking jobs away from Americans. Again in this area we have
existing laws that theoretically prohibit employers from hiring
illegal immigrants. If we choose to actually enforce the laws
it might drive the cost of grapes up, but it would increase wages
in the process. It’s all a matter of trade-offs. Perhaps
a more pernicious economic impact is the supporting cost of education,
health care and other public or semi-public services whose costs
are borne by citizens. This is a problem, but one that could be
solved very simply by not extending those services to illegal
aliens. Unfortunately, that is a trade-off we seem not to want
to make. We seem unwilling to make others live with the consequences
of their freely chosen (and law breaking) behavior. That would
make us seem mean. You know what? If we are not willing to take
the simple steps to solve it, then this must not be a big enough
problem to fret about.
Culture. Lack of cultural assimilation is a
major issue. Both the rate of illegal influx and its non-official
nature agitate against assimilation. It is reasonable to assume
that continued massive influx of illegal immigrants will create
problems. Every example in history cautions us against the corrosive
nature of a sustained cultural balkanization. The most effective
way to solve it would seem to be very straightforward –
enforce existing laws and aggressively restrict entry of illegal
immigrants. There are other contributing factors, but in the absence
of a critical mass of rootless foreign workers they will not matter.
No need for comprehensive reform here – just do what you
should be doing anyway. Reduce the flow, reduce incentives for
those already here, and assimilation will happen as readily with
Mexicans as it did with previous iterations of European immigrants.
Politics. The “problem” for Democrats
is that they cannot win elections with their current demographics.
And since their core constituencies tend to do a lousy job of
natural reproduction, they are desperate for a new source of votes
and power. If they can become the champions of the illegal Mexican
immigrant vote, they can lock in tens of millions of Democrats
for years. The problem for Republicans is if the Democrats are
successful. It bothers me to the bone that a crisis is being declared
in order to facilitate political strategery. Even if I were a
Democrat this sort of skullduggery would make me oppose the bill.
Fairness and Standards. There is a profound
problem with rewarding law-breaking. No matter how wonderful the
law-breakers may be, no matter what fabulous values they may have.
They are still law-breakers. The American people have a huge problem
with that. On the other hand, the American people are also profoundly
compassionate and wish harm on no person. Quite a conflict. Quite
a trade-off. But doing nothing wouldn’t make it worse, would
it?
As far as I can tell, most of the actual problem identified here
can be very handily addressed by enforcing the laws we already
have on the books. Reduce the flow though supply (border control)
and demand (actually enforcing laws against hiring illegal aliens).
But what I think I began to see emerging through the murk of
rhetoric is that so much of what we have identified is actually
a desire for the political and business classes to avoid
enforcing the law as it exists. That’s the real
problem. They want to avoid making the hard trade-offs. They want
to “solve” the problem by declaring it to no longer
be a problem. No illegals here by golly. Nosiree. Just lots of
us Americans. Hallelujah, pass the apple pie! Problem solved.
We are becoming a nation of wimps, unable to contemplate making
simple hard choices and living with them. No matter how this all
turns out, this is not a good sign.
|