No Answers
But plenty of questions
There’s no understanding it.
Rational people just can’t get to the places these killers’
minds inhabit.
This time, when it was over, there were 32 murders and one suicide
to deal with.
Try finding the rational in that.
And the only person who might’ve been able to tell us why
he did it put a pistol to his head and pulled the trigger.
That put an end to that line of inquiry.
NBC News decided to air parts of the killer’s "manifesto"
in an effort to allow us to gain some "insight" into
the killer’s mind. The "manifesto" quickly made
its way onto other news outlets
I didn’t watch it.
Maybe it was reasonable and newsworthy to air what I understand
was a rambling, incoherent tantrum, but I come down on the side
that asks why. Why should we give this deranged individual precisely
what he wanted – an audience? Why was it necessary to add
to the grief of parents who were reeling from the fact that their
children were dead?
The gist of his "manifesto" could’ve been recounted
and that, to me, would’ve been enough. I understand the
need for news, but now I worry that another psycho has been shown
precisely how to capture "fame."
As regards what to do, I don’t have the answers. I’m
not sure any of us do. For sure, I don’t think there’s
going to be any quick solution. That is, I don’t think anyone
will be able to point to something and say, "There. Fix (prohibit/stop/change)
that and this will never happen again."
It’s taken us a long time to get to where we are and it’s
going to take just as long to fix – if it’s possible.
One thing that seems apparent, however, is that whatever’s
gone wrong sure seems to have its worst effect on young males.
Over the past week, I’ve heard that one of the many things
we need to look at is how the violence in games, videos, songs,
and movies is desensitizing our kids.
It strikes me that spending hours on end, day after day, blowing
away everyone and everything would have an effect on "normal"
kids. Take a kid who’s been bullied, is a loner, and who
isolates himself in some violent fantasy world and I’d put
money on that effect being downright bad.
We might want to ask ourselves what do we do about people who
send up a lot of warning flags. This kid had a lot of people on
edge for quite some time, but he’d broken no laws.
It’s a tough call because your definition of "odd
and strange" might be my definition of "deranged and
dangerous." Where do we draw the line? Who makes the decision?
Guns are part of the equation too but, despite everything we’re
going to hear on this topic, they remain morally neutral objects.
They’re well designed tools that can be misused.
What stands out, however, is that their current misuse sure seems
to coincide with a coarseness and a lowering of morals and standards
that have crept into our society.
Guns were every bit as easy – if not easier - to get 50
years ago. Back then, young boys could literally go down to the
corner hardware store and buy ammunition for their .22s (which
they often carried on their bikes) and no one gave it much thought.
They didn’t give it much thought because, 50 years ago,
young males weren’t regularly walking into schools and shooting
everyone in sight.
Something’s changed, but it hasn’t been the guns.
I’ve spent a lot of words in this column on the pace of
life we now live.
We need to slow down. We need to take a breather. We need to
reengage with our kids – especially the young males out
there.
They need time. Our time. Time to learn the things they’re
good at and the things that might be beyond their talents. They
need strong, positive examples in their lives. I guarantee that
an XBox or a music video won’t meet that need.
You fill in all of the things I’ve missed and, even then,
we’ll still never know if it’ll prevent another incident
like this. That’s because there is such a thing as evil.
And sometimes, no matter what we do, bad things will still happen.
But, looking back on what "bad things" meant not that
many years ago, I think we need to ask ourselves why the definition
has changed so much for the worse.
The consequences of not doing so are, once again, in the news.
|